Ключові слова

agrocenosis, main ecological trophic groups, number, hydrothermal coefficient, agricultural plants.

Як цитувати

Beznosko, I., Gorgan, T., & Mosiychuk, I. (2021). QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION THE MICROORGANISMS OF RHIZOSPHERE AGRICULTURAL PLANTS. ГРААЛЬ НАУКИ, (8), 119-125. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.24.09.2021.24


During 2020, on the basis of stationary and temporary field experiments, which are located in the Skvуra Research Station of Organic Production of NAAS, Nosiv SDS and the Institute of Vegetable and Melon NAAS were studied quantitative composition of the soil micromycetes under different agricultural crops: winter wheat, spring barley and onion. The vegetation period in the Kyiv region was characterized by – sufficiently moist (HTC 1,7), and in Chernihiv and Kharkiv regions drought prevailed (HTC 0,6). Adverse weather conditions such as drought or waterlogging are crucial factors in changing the number of mycobiomes in the studied soils.
Stationary field experiments in the selection Nosivka during the ontogenesis winter wheat characterized the greatest number pedatrophic and less number of amylolytic, cellulosolytic ecological-trophic groups. The stationary experiments field researches were also conducted in Skvyra Research Station of Organic Production. Where the rhizosphere soil under spring barley crops is characterized by a larger number of micromycetes, as well as amylolytic and cellulolytic ecological-trophic groups. Was determined the number of soil micromycetes the main ecological and trophic groups. The rhizosphere soil on the stationary field of the Institute of Vegetable and Melon NAAS during the ontogenesis of different varieties of onions characterized by high number cellulosolytic group of micromycetes, which despite the decrease in the hydrothermal coefficient increased by the end of the growing season of the culture.
Therefore, the interaction between plants and micromycetes is a dynamic process in which the hydrothermal coefficient during the growing season, soil type, and the root system of agricultural plants, this influences the formation of soil mycobiome.



Patika N.V., Patika V.F. (2013) Modern problems of biodiversity. Feed and feed production. Edition 76, P. 10-109

Andreyuk K.I., Iutinskaya G.O., Antipchuk A.F. (1992). Fundamentals ecology soil microorganisms. Kiev: Naukova. Dumka.

Demyanyuk O. S., Patyka V. P., Sherstoboeva О. V., Bunas A. A. (2018). Formation of the structure of microbiocenoses of soils of agroecosystems depending on trophic andhydrothermal factors. Biosystems Diversity, 26(2). Р. 103–110. doi:10.15421/011816

Aislabie J. A. (2013). Soil microbes and their contribution to soil services. Ecosystem services in New Zealand – condition sand trends. New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press, P. 143-161.

Pandey S. N. (2018). Diversity, functions, andstress responses of soil microorganisms. Plant microbiome: Stress response. Microorganisms for Sustainability, 5. Р. 1-19. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5514-0_1

Demchenko M.M. (2008). Rhizosphere microorganisms in the soil-plant system. Proceedings of the Lower Volga agro-university complex. Agronomy and forestry. P.34-37

Dobrovolsky G. V. Nikitin E. D. (2006). Ecology of soils. M.: Publishing house of Moscow State University.

Iutynskaya G.O. (2006). Soil microbiology: Textbook. K.: Aristei.

Nannipieri Р. (2003). Microbial diversity and soil functions. European Journal of Soil Science. Р. 655–670.

Soil quality. Determination of the number of microorganisms in the soil by sowing on a solid (agar) nutrient medium. DSTU 7847: (2015). Kyiv: State Standard of Ukraine.

D.G. Zvyagintsev (1991). Methods of soil microbiology and biochemistry. Moscow: Moscow State University.

Netrusov A.I., Egorova M.A., Zakharchuk L.M. et al. (2005). Practical work on microbiology M.: Publishing house. Center "Academy".

Creative Commons License

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

| Переглядів: 23 | Завантажень: 11 |