THE BRIEF SURVEY OF EVOLUTION OF THE RUSSIAN STUDY OF TALES. THE REPRESENTATION OF HERMENEUTICS OF FABULOUS PARADIGMS IN THE CREATIVE WORKS OF A. PUSHKIN

Abstract

The history of study of the Russian literary tales is set out in writing as emergence of tendencies or existence of different schools and their representatives. Every epoch, trend and certain scientists advanced the new ideas carried on by other experts in the process of further development of science. Therefore, the description of the history of study of tales corresponds to the description of evolution of this scientific branch according to some tendencies demonstrating and concentrating certain issues.
The study of the literary tales is asserted to be closely associated with the history of the country and the ways of reflection of people’s self-consciousness. The public, literary and scientific interest in the tales came into existence as far back as the XVIII-th c., went through the period of astounding growth in the XIX-th c., the decline in the first half and the renaissance in the second half of the XX-th c. The stable attention to tales is paid at the turn of the XXI-st century.
Scientists persistently searched a platform for the systematization of tales, examined the peculiarities of this genre – its main features, characteristics, definitions – in order to distinguish tales from other genres. Both a form of a tale and its content – with the prospective morals – were carefully analysed. The form and the content (or the idea) either were separated or opposed till the scientists came to the brilliant thought of their unity as the form represented a shell in which an idea or a world-view found their expression.
A great Russian scientist A. Veselovskiy insisted on the necessity of creating morphology of tales, later this task was performed by the other famous Russian researcher V. Propp. V. Propp did not fix the separate features in poetics of tales but he focused on their structure and composition as a whole. Also, the relation of constant, invariable elements of tales to changeable, variable elements was gradually studied and defined.
The modern scientific views are based on the thought that the essence of literary tales as the phenomenon of spiritual culture is likely to be expanded in the process of studying the origin, the development, the interpretation of tales and exceeding the limits of the genre. In the present article the point of view is illustrated that the history of tales is so complex and their study is so difficult that they can hardly ever be kept within the definite bounds.
The fairy tales of A. Pushkin have the peculiar attractiveness because they bear the stamp of genius of their creator. The present research in hermeneutics of the Russian literary tales is based on the tales by A. Pushkin as the most capacious hermeneutical paradigms. It should be noted that for the first time an attempt to reveal and interpret their hidden, inherent meanings has been made on the basis of hermeneutics of the works of art.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Views: 15 | Downloads: 8

Author Biography

Tetyana Vorova, Дніпровський національний університет імені Олеся Гончара

кандидат філологічних наук, доцент, доцент кафедри англійської мови для нефілологічних спеціальностей

References

Azadovskiy, M. K. (2013). Istoriya russkoy folkloristiki : v 2 t. M.: RGGU, 560.

Azadovskiy, M. K. (1938). Literatura i folklor. M.: Khudozh. liter., 297.

Azadovskiy, M. K. (1960). Stati o literature i folklore. M.-L.: Goslitizdat, 547.

Azizov, D. L. (1982). O russkom romantizme. Suzhdeniya Ap. Grigorieva. Problemy estetiki i tvorchestva romantikov : Mezhvuz. tematich. sb. KGU. Kalinin: KGU, 157–168.

Alekseev, M. P. (1982). Zametki na polyakh Pushkina. Pushkin i povest F. M. Klingera «Istoriya o zolotom petukhe». Vremennik Pushkinskoy komissii (1979). L.: Nauka, 59–95.

Baevskiy, V. S. (1977). Problema psikhologicheskogo parallelizma. Sibirskiy folklor, 4. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 57–75.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. M.: Iskusstvo, 445.

Belenitskiy, L. M. (1998). Tekhnologiya Puti. K.: Nika-Tsentr, 512.

Belinskiy, V. G. (1953). Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 13-ti tomakh. Tom 1: Stati i retsenzii. Khudozhestvennye proizvedeniya. 1829–1833. M.: AN SSSR, 576.

Belov, V. I. (1982). Lad: Ocherki o narodnoy estetike. M.: Khudozh. liter., 230.

Botnikova, A. B. (2005). Nemetskiy romantizm: Dialog khudozhestvennykh form : monografiya. M.: Aspekt Press, 351.

Braude, L. Yu. (1977). K istorii ponyatiya «literaturnaya skazka». Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya yazyka i literatury, 36 (№ 3). M.: AN SSSR, 226–234.

Veselovskiy, A. N. (1989). Istoricheskaya poetika. M.: Vyssh. shk., 404.

Vorova, T. P. (2020). Germenevticheskie paradigmy russkikh literaturnykh skazok i neskazochnykh proizvedeniy pervoy poloviny XIX v. : monografiya. Dnepr: Monolit, 464.

Gadamer, Kh.-G. (1988). Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki. M.: Progress, 704.

Gasparov, M. L. (1986). Istoricheskaya poetika i sravnitelnoe stikhovedenie (problema sravnitelnoy metriki). Istoricheskaya poetika: itogi i perspektivy izucheniya. M.: Nauka, 336.

Gerlovan, O. K. (1996). Russkaya literaturnaya skazka XVIII – nachala XIX v. : Ponyatie, istoki, tipologiya : dis. … kand. filol. n. M., 233.

Gister, M. A. (2005). Russkaya literaturnaya skazka XVIII veka: istoriya, poetika, istochniki : dis. …kand. filol. n. M., 263.

Glagolev, A. G. (1834). Umozritelnye i opytnye osnovaniya slovesnosti : v 4 ch. SPb.: Tip. Imper. Ros. Akad, Ch. 1, 63; ch. 2, 152; ch. 3, 108; ch. 4, 148.

Grech, N. I. (1819). Uchebnaya kniga rossiyskoy slovesnosti. SPb.: Tip. N. Grecha, ch. I, 450.

Grintser, P. A. (1987). Osnovnye kategorii skazki. M.: Nauka, 312.

Dal, V. I. (2018). Teksty proizvedeniy V. I. Dalya. URL: www. Philolog.petrsu.ru (Last accessed: 04. 05. 2018).

Derbeneva, L. V. (2007). Arkhetip i mif kak arkhaicheskie sostavlyayushchie russkoy realisticheskoy literatury vtoroy poloviny XIX veka: monografiya. Ivano-Frankovsk: Fakel, 428.

Dereza, L. V. (2001). Russkaya literaturnaya skazka pervoy poloviny XIX veka: monografiya. Dnepropetrovsk: DNU, 140.

Dereza, L. V. (2006). Transformatsiya mifomira narodnoy volshebnoy skazki v romanticheskoy literature. Lіteratura v kontekstі kulturi. Zb. nauk. prats. Dnіpropetrovsk : DNU, 16 (T. II), 44–67.

Zhirmunskiy, V. M. (1979). K voprosu o mezhdunarodnykh skazochnykh syuzhetakh. Sravnitelnoe literaturovedenie: Vostok i Zapad. L.: Nauka, 336–343.

Zvantseva, Ye. P. (1979). Zhanr literaturnoy skazki v tvorchestve V. A. Zhukovskogo. Traditsii i novatorstvo v khudozhestvennoy literature: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. st. Gorkiy: GGPI, 59–67.

Iezuitova, R. V. (1976). Literatura vtoroy poloviny 1820-kh – 1830-kh godov i folklor. Russkaya literatura i folklor. Pervaya polovina XIX veka. L.: Nauka, 85–142.

Kalashnikova, O. L. (1991). Russkiy roman 1760 – 1770-kh godov: Uchebnoe posobie. Dnepropetrovsk: DGU, 160.

Kartashova, I. V. (1982). Svoeobrazie romanticheskoy pozitsii Gogolya v «Mirgorode». Problemy estetiki i tvorchestva romantikov : Mezhvuz. tematich. sb. KGU. Kalinin: KGU, 90–122.

Kireeva, O. I. (1995). Stanovlenie russkoy literaturnoy skazki (vtoraya polovina XVIII – pervaya polovina XIX veka) : dis. … kand. filol. n. SPb., 203.

Kichenko, A. S. (2003). Mifologicheskie formy v folklore i istorii russkoy literatury XІX veka: monografiya. Cherkassy: ChDU, 372.

Konon, V. V. (1987). Vechno yunaya mudrost naroda. Zametki o karnavalnoy prirode narodnoy skazki. Detskaya literatura, 5, 12–15.

Korepova, K. Ye. (2012). Russkaya lubochnaya skazka: monografiya. M.: Forum, 464.

Kuzmina, V. D. (1964). Rytsarskiy roman na Rusi. Petr zlatykh klyuchey. Bova. M.: Nauka, 344.

Kuper, Dzh. (1995). Entsiklopediya simvolov. Kn. IV. M.: Assotsiatsiya Dukhovnogo Yedineniya «Zolotoy Vek», 412.

Lanovik, Z. B. (2006). Hermeneutica Sacra. Ternopіl: TNPU, 587.

Leyderman, N. L. (1982). Dvizhenie vremeni i zakony zhanra : monografiya. Sverdlovsk: Sred.-Ural. kn. izd-vo, 256.

Leonova, T. G. (1982). Russkaya literaturnaya skazka XIX veka v ee otnoshenii k narodnoy skazke: Poeticheskaya sistema zhanra v istoricheskom razvitii. Tomsk: TGU, 197.

Lipovetskiy, M. N. (1992). Poetika literaturnoy skazki (na materiale russkoy literatury 1920 – 1980-kh godov): monografiya. Sverdlovsk: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 184.

Literaturnaya entsiklopediya terminov i ponyatiy / gl. red. i sost. A. N. Nikolyutin, (2003). M.: NPK «INTYeLVAK», 1600 stlb.

Likhachev, D. S. (1979). Poetika drevnerusskoy literatury. M.: Nauka, 360.

Lotman, Yu. M. (1970). Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta. M.: Iskusstvo, 384.

Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Proiskhozhdenie syuzheta v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Izbrannye stati. Stati po semiotike i tipologii kultury. Tallin: Aleksandra, t. 1, 224–242.

Lupanova, I. P. (1959). Russkaya narodnaya skazka v tvorchestve pisateley pervoy poloviny XIX veka : monografiya. Petrozavodsk: Gosizdat Karelskoy ASSR, 504.

Mamuna, N. V. (2000). Zodiakalnaya mifologiya. Zodiak bogov. M.: Aleteya, 360.

Matsapura, V. I. (2009). Gogol: Khudozhestvennyy mir skvoz prizmu poetiki. Poltava: Poltavskiy lіterator, 304.

Medrish, D. N. (1980). Literatura i folklornaya traditsiya: Voprosy poetiki. Saratov: SGU, 296.

Meletinskiy, Ye. M. (1986). «Istoricheskaya poetika» A. N. Veselovskogo i problema proiskhozhdeniya povestvovatelnoy literatury. Istoricheskaya poetika : itogi i perspektivy izucheniya. M.: Nauka, 25–52.

Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya: v 2-kh tt., (1987). M.: SE, t. I, 671; t. II, 719.

Musiy, V. B. (2008). Mifopoetika russkoy predromanticheskoy i romanticheskoy prozy: monografiya. Odessa: Astroprint, 300.

Mukhina, S. L. (1982). «Orleanskaya deva» V. A. Zhukovskogo i problema narodnosti. Problemy estetiki i tvorchestva romantikov : Mezhvuz. tematich. sb. KGU. Kalinin: KGU, 123–139.

Nagishkin, D. D. (1957). Skazka i zhizn: Pisma o skazke. M.: Detgiz, 270.

Neelov, Ye. M. (1974). O kategoriyakh volshebnogo i fantasticheskogo v sovremennoy literaturnoy skazke. Khudozhestvennyy obraz i istoricheskoe soznanie: mezhvuz. sb. Petrozavodsk: PGU, 23–48.

Nikiforov, A. I. (2008). Skazka i skazochnik. M.: OGI, 376.

Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t., (2000). M.: Mysl, t. I, 721; t. II, 634.; t. III, 692.; t. IV, 605.

Ostolopov, N. F. (1812). O skazke. Sankt-Peterb. vestn. (№ 2), 282–292.

Ovchinnikova, L. V. (2001). Russkaya literaturnaya skazka XX veka : Istoriya, klassifikatsiya, poetika : dis…. dokt. filol. n. M., 387.

Propp, V. Ya. (1976). Folklor i deystvitelnost. M.: Nauka, 328.

Propp, V. Ya. (1998). Morfologiya < volshebnoy> skazki. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki. M.: Labirint, 520.

Propp, V. Ya. (1986). Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki. L.: LGU, 364.

Propp, V. Ya. (2000). Russkaya skazka: sobranie trudov. M.: Labirint, 416.

Putilov, B. N. (1976). Metodologiya sravnitelno-istoricheskogo izucheniya folklora. L.: Nauka, 242.

Pushkin, A. S. (1985). Stikhotvoreniya. Skazki. Ruslan i Lyudmila: poema. Sobr. soch. v trekh tomakh. M.: Khudozh. liter., t. 1, 735.

Safuanova, A. I. (2016). Russkaya dramaticheskaya skazka 1930-50-kh g.g. (Tipologiya geroev i konfliktov): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. n. M., 26.

Surat, I.Z. (1985). Zhanr stikhotvornoy skazki v russkoy literature 1830-kh godov : dis. … kand. filol. n. M., 239.

Timaev, M. M. (1832). Nachertanie kursa izyashchnoy slovesnosti. SPb.: Tip. A. Plyushara, 228.

Tomashevskiy, B. V. (1999). Teoriya literatury. Poetika. M.: Aspekt-Press, 336.

Toporkov, A. L. (1997). Teoriya mifa v russkoy filologicheskoy nauke XIX veka. M.: Indrik, 456.

Freydenberg, O. M. (1997). Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. M.: Labirint, 448.

Khalizev, V. Ye. (2005). Teoriya literatury: uchebnik. M.: Vyssh. shk., 405.

Chervinskaya, O. V. (1998). Retseptsiya literaturnogo napravleniya v aspekte zhanrovoy produktivnosti traditsii: akmeisticheskiy opyt: dis. … dokt. filol. n. K., 482.

Chervіnska, O. V. (2011). Germenevtiko-retseptivniy ta mіfopoetichniy kontsepti u praktitsі suchasnoї lіteraturnoї teorії. Aktualnі problemi romano-germanskoї fіlologії ta prikladnoї lіngvіstiki: zb. nauk. st., 1 (2). Chernіvtsі: ChNU, 179–197.

Chernets, L. V. (1982). Literaturnye zhanry (problemy tipologii i poetiki). M.: MGU, 194.

Chernysheva, T. A. (1979). Priroda fantastiki (gnoseologicheskiy i esteticheskiy aspekty fantasticheskoy obraznosti) : dis. … dokt. filol. n. Irkutsk, 423.

Shklovskiy, V. B. (1983). O teorii prozy. M.: Sov. pisatel, 384.

Shleyermakher, F. D. (2004). Germenevtika. / Per. s nem. A. L. Volskogo. Nauch. red. N. O. Guchinskaya. SPb.: Yevropeyskiy Dom, 242 s.

Shustov, M. P. (2003). Skazochnaya traditsiya v russkoy literature XIX veka : dis. … dokt. filol. n. Nizhniy Novgorod, 473.

Eliade, M. (1995). Aspekty mifa. M.: «Invest-PPP», 240.

Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar, (1990). Reprintnoe izdanie slovarya F. A. Brokgauza, I. A. Yefrona, v 82 t., 1890. M.: Terra, t. 59, 162.

Yugan, N. L. (2018). Zhanrovaya paradigma tvorchestva V. I. Dalya : monografiya. Mariupol : GVUZ «PGTU», 474.

Published
2021-06-17