PECULIARITY OF THE PROCESS OF MYTHOLOGIZING THE LITERARY IMAGE

Abstract

The work gives artistic and philosophical descriptions of the myth. The focus of attention is concentrated on the integration of the concept “myth” into the categorical system of literary studies in view of insights achieved by the philological science in the sphere of mythology. It is also devoted to the study and understanding of the main forms and possibilities of interpretation of traditional images and plots in the literature. Average attention to certain problems and motivations of the mythology of the XX-XXI centuries, the peculiarities of the functioning of traditional structures are determined, topics that are actively transformed are analyzed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Views: 89 | Downloads: 37

Author Biography

Tetiana Pryshchepa, Дніпровський національний університет імені Олеся Гончара

кандидат філологічних наук, доцент кафедри англійської мови для нефілологічних спеціальностей

References

Amyrian, T. N. (2015). From classic detective to postmodern detective: aspects of genre transformation. Metamorphoses of the genre in modern literature. M., 138–153.

Arystotel. "Myth" and unity of action. Retrieved from URL: http://www.sno.pro1.ru/lib/torsh/20.htm

Barna, N. V. Image as a mythological archetype: philosophical and aesthetic analysis. Retrieved from URL: https://www.filosof.com. ua/Jornel/M_69/Barna.pdf

Bart, R. (1989). Selected works. Semiotics. Poetics. М.: Prohress, 616.

Holnyk, O. (2013). Myth in the art world of Yevhen Malanyuk. Kirovohrad. Imeks-LTD, 217.

Hulyha, A. V. (1984). Myth and modernity (about some aspects of the literary process). Foreign literature. 2. 167–175.

Hulyha, A. V. (1985). Myth as a philosophical problem. Ancient culture and modern science. М.: Nauka, 271–276.

Hurduz, A. (2008). Mythopoetic paradigm in Ukrainian and Western European prose about the land of the late XIX - first third of XX century: Monograph. Mykolaiv Vyd-Vo MDHU Im. P. Mohyly 216.

Deloz, Zh. (2009). Transcendental empiricism. Kyiv Akademiia, 235.

Dolhenko, A. Mythologization of literary texts in Russian decadent prose. Retrieved from URL: http://gosha-p.narod.ru/Articles/Dolgenko.htm

Dranenko, H. F. (2011). Myth as a form of meaning and the meaning of form. Mythocritical reading of the works of B.-M. Coltes: Monograph. Chernivtsi ChNU, 440.

Lotman, Yu. (1994). Dialogue with the screen. Tallynn Aleksandra, 216 с.

Markova, T. N. (2015). Ways of genre transformations in Russian prose at the turn of the XX-XXI centuries. Metamorphoses of the genre in modern literature. М., 7–27.

Meletynskyi, E. M. (1991). Analytical psychology and the problem of the origin of archetypal plots. Philosophy questions. 10. 41–47.

Meletynskyi, E. M. (1996). The poetics of myth. Myth theory. М.: Nauka, 406.

Musyi, V. B. (2006). Myth in the artistic development of human perception of the world in the literary era of pre-romanticism and romanticism: Monograph. Odessa Astroprynt, 432.

Nyzamyddynov, D. N. (1993). Mythological culture. М.: Helyos, 46.

Niamtsu, A. (1997). Legendary and mythological tradition in world literature. Tradition and innovation in world literature. К.: Abrys, 234.

Niamtsu, A. (2002). Legendary images in literature. Chernovtsy: Ruta, 175.

Niamtsu, A. (2003). Fundamentals of the theory of traditional plots. Chernovtsy: Ruta, 80.

Niamtsu, A. (1998). About the functioning of traditional plots. Poetics of traditional plots. Chernovtsy: Ruta, 115.

Niamtsu, A. (2009). Russian Faustian: A Study Guide. Chernovtsy: Ruta, 228.

Niamtsu, A. (2001). Tradition in Slavic and Western European literatures (problems of theory). Chernovtsy: Ruta, 152.

Niamtsu, A. (2012). Троянська міфологія у літературному контексті: Монографія. Chernovtsy: ChNU, 216.

Pakhsarian, N. T. (2015). Completing the classics: modern sequels to Chauderlos de Laclos' novel Dangerous Liaisons (K. Baroche, L. de Greve). Metamorphoses of the genre in modern literature: Collection of scientific papers. М., 120–138.

Polishchuk, Ya. (2002). Mythological horizon. Aesthetics of myth. Ivano-Frankivsk Lileia-NV, 392.

Pronkevych, O. (2016). Literature and animation. Ontology of literature in modern communicative conditions. Mykolaiv, 234–266.

Skorokhodko, Yu. S. (2011). The cultural and literary foundations of the English neo-Victorian novel. Actual problems of Slavic philology. XXІV. 1. 233–240.

Soloviova, N. O. (1991). Tapestry Room: English Gothic Prose. М.: Pravda, 560.

Solomakhina, Yu. F. (2014). The question of interpretation of the myth in the author's text. A young scientist. 4(07)(2). 24–26.

Storokha, B. (2016). Screening and re-literalization: to the question of the connection between literary and cinematic texts. Ontology of literature in modern communicative conditions. Mykolaiv, 209–233.

Fomina, H. V. (2009). Myth and legend in the cultural space: Monograph. Chernivtsi: Ruta, 239.

Franchise. A guide to useful tips. Retrieved from URL: http://dovidkam.com/porady/shho-take-franshiza.html

Shellynh, V. F. (1987). Essays. 2. М.: Mysl, 637.

Shyhapova, Y. Y. Screen culture: creators and consumers. Retrieved from URL: http://human.snauka.ru/2014/05/6680

Birch, D. (2008). Our Victorian Education. Oxford: Blackwell, 192.

Frye, Northrop. (1990). Anatomy of Criticism: Four essays. London: Penguin Books, 383.

Markiewiez, H. (1987). Literatura i mity. Tworezose. W-wa., 10. 55–70.

Published
2021-06-17