THE ROLE OF THE INTELLIGENTSIA IN THE FORMATION OF CIVIL SOCIETY

Abstract

The current state of civil society in Ukraine is analysed. It is shown that in comparison with the countries of developed democracies, the civil society in Ukraine is weak, unconsolidated, such that it is solely in the process of its formation. It is expressed ones opinion that the intelligentsia is able to unite society and achieve civil harmony in it.The worldview and methodological substantiation of the author's position is post-classical rationality, which, overcoming the subject-object rupture, forms a new idea of the essential forces and functions of the intelligentsia. It turns out that the intelligentsia embodies the best qualities of society, is present in all its spheres and practices, acts as its special unifying and transforming force. It is concluded that the intelligentsia in society plays a unifying role, produces basic values common to all, builds an orderly system of relations at the horizontal level between different social groups and between the power vertical and its institutions and civil society, performs the educational and human role is necessary to build civil society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

| Views: 49 | Downloads: 39

Author Biography

L. Telizhenko, Sumy State University

Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Fundamental Jurisprudence and Constitutional Law

References

Rublov, O.S. Intelihentsiia. Entsyklopediia suchasnoi Ukrainy (2011). (T. 11). Kyiv: Instytut entsyklopedychnykh doslidzhen NAN Ukrainy.

Gouldner, A.U. (1979). Budushcheye intelligentsii i stanovleniye novogo klassa. Moskva: AST.

Yablonskyi, V.M., Andriichenko, T.V., & Bekeshkina, I.E. (2018). Hromadianske suspilstvo Ukrainy: suchasni praktyky ta vyklyky rozvytku : analitychna dopovid. Kyiv: NISD.

Hromadianske suspilstvo v Ukraini: pohliad hromadian. Vylucheno iz https://dif.org.ua/article/gromadyanske-suspilstvo-v-ukraini-poglyad-gromadyan.

Korniievskyi, O., Sydorenko, D., & Pelivanova, N. (2021). Kliuchovi vyklyky dlia rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva, 2020. Stan rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini u 2020 rotsi : materialy. shchorich. dop. Kyiv: NISD.

Novyi zvit: hlobalnyi spad demokratii pryskoryvsia. Vylucheno iz https://freedomhouse.org/uk/article/noviy-zvit-globalniy-spad-demokratii-priskorivsya.

Kuli-Ivanchenko, K.K. (2019). Stanovlennia ta rozvytok vzaiemodii hromadianskoho suspilstva ta derzhavy: analiz doktrynalnykh dzherel ta zakonoproektnykh robit. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia «Pravo», (56, 1), 54.

Shvab, K., & Mallere, T. (2020). COVID-19: Velikaya perezagruzka. 2020. Видалено із https://www.litlib.net/bk/135579/read.

Kovalova H.P., & Danilian V.O. Ukraina u svitovykh hlobalizatsiinykh protsesakh: vyklyky i vidpovidi. Naukovyi visnyk. Seriia «Filosofiia». Kharkiv: KhNPU, 2015. Vyp.45 (chastyna I).

Gardus M. Revolyutsiya i ideologiya. Prichiny porazheniya Yevromaydana. Vilucheno іz https://hvylya.net/analytics/politics/revolyutsiya-i-ideologiya-prichinyi-porazheniya-evromaydana.html.

Doslidzhennia: yak oliharkhy vplyvaiut na ekonomiku Ukrainy. Vylucheno iz https://rus.lb.ua/economics/2017/03/27/362142_doslidzhennya_yak_oligarhi_vplivayut.html.

Hromadianske suspilstvo v Ukraini: tsyfry i fakty. Vylucheno iz https://www.prostir.ua/?news=hromadyanske-suspilstvo-ukrajiny-tsyfry-i-fakty.

Yermolaiev rozpoviv pro naslidky borotby z oliharkhamy i vidkryttia rynku zemli. 7 chervnia 2021 r. Vylucheno iz https://life.znaj.ua/386166-yermolayev-rozpoviv-pro-naslidki-borotbi-z-oligarhami-i-vidkrittya-rinku-zemli.

Kal′noy, I. (2009). Grazhdanskoye soglasiye kak predposilka formirovaniya obshchestva. Kul′tura narodov Prichernomor′ya. (164).

Stepanova, O.K. (2003). «Intelligentsiya»: konkurentsiya lokalizatsiy v simvolicheskom prostranstve. Professional′nyye gruppy intelligentsii. Moskva: In-t sotsiologii RAN.

Shelling, F.V. (1998). Sochineniya. Moskva: Mysl′.

Mikhaylovskiy, N.K. (1897). Zapiski sovremennika. Sochineniya. Spb., (T. 5).

Kolonitskiy, B.I. Intelligent kontsa XIX – nachala XX veka: problemy identifikatsii (k postanovke voprosa). Sotsial′naya istoriya rossiyskoy intelligentsii. Vilucheno іz https://kpfu.ru/staff_files/F1272290290/_15_12__1__Socialnaya.istoriya2011.pdf.

Boborykin, P. (1904). Russkaya intelligentsiya. Russkaya mysl′. (12).

Pyrohovski zizdy u druhii polovyni KhIKh stolittia. Vylucheno iz http://hismed.net/node/127.

Bondarenko, O.V. (2008). Ukrainska intelihentsiia yak fenomen vitchyznianoi istorii: pohliad suchasnyka. Kultura narodov prychernomoria. (134), 67.

Kizima, V.V. (2008). PG-dual′naya rol′ intelligentsii v istorii. Uchenyye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsional′nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya». (3, 21), 12-17.

Kizima, V.V. (2009). Intelligentsiya, tsennosti i smysly v menyayushchemsya mire. Kul′tura narodov Prichernomor′ya. (164), 20.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (1990). Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu. Moskva: Progress.

Shlemkevych, M. (1954). Zahublena ukrainska liudyna. Niu-York: Kliuchi.

Toynbi, A.Dzh. (1991). Postizheniye istorii. Moskva: Progress.

Lypynskyi, V. (1919-1926). Lysty do brativ-khliborobiv pro ideiu i orhanizatsiiu ukrainskoho monarkhizmu. Vylucheno iz https://diasporiana.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/books/3615/file.pdf.

Kizima, V.V. (2010). Rol′ intelligentsii v usloviyakh globalizatsii. Rol′ intelligentsii v formirovanii ideologii srednego klassa. Simferopol′.

Il′in, I.L. (1948-1954). Nashi zadachi. V poiskakh spravedlivosti. Vilucheno іz http://apocalypse.orthodoxy.ru/problems/072.htm.

Mul′tikul′turalizm obremenyayet Yevropu. Vilucheno іz https://mnenia.zahav.ru/Articles/2254/chto_obremenyaet_evropu.

Gurevich, P.S. (2012). Fenomen debiologizatsii cheloveka. Chelovek v yedinstve sotsial′nykh i biologicheskikh kachestv. Moskva: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM».

Koen, Dzh.L., & Arato, E. (2003). Grazhdanskoye obshchestvo i politicheskaya teoriya. Moskva: Ves′ Mir.

Nicolescu, B. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: the hidden third, between the subject and the object. Human and Social Studies. (1).

Charter of Transdisciplinarity. Вилучено із http://web.archive.org/web/20041205093617/http://perso.club-internet.fr/nicol/ciret/english/charten.htm.

Yaspers, K. (1994). Istoki istorii i yeye tsel′. Smysl i naznacheniye istorii. Moskva: Respublika.

Tolkovyy slovar′ Ozhegova. Vilucheno іz https://slovarozhegova.ru/word.php?wordid=7335.

Published
2021-11-29