The theoretical foundations of the innovations formation in the public governance of foreign countries are investigated and the need for changes in approaches to innovations is substantiated by authors in this article. Introduction. The reasons for the importance of innovations in public governance and the need to promote consistent and reliable innovations to face the changes are identified. Main part. The analysis of scientific works and researches of innovative systems is carried out and modern approaches to the study of innovation and innovative systems in public governance are generalized. Various scientific approaches to innovation systems are considered, factors of influence on the environment of public governance and the differences between the creation of innovations in public and private governance are defined. The reasons and conditions conducive to the creation of innovative systems are established. The definition of innovation in the context of public governance is proposed as the application of new knowledge, resources, technologies or approaches that can be applied to improve results compared to conventional methods of carrying out activities. The methods of origin of the innovations in public governance, its goals, elements, types and forms, are considered. The necessity of applying a systematic approach to innovations in public governance in current conditions is substantiated. The characteristics of innovation in public governance are analyzed and the implications for a systemic perspective are identified. The directions of innovation support in public governance are formed for more consistent and reliable generation, implementation and scaling up of innovations in response to the diverse needs of public governance. Conducting research on creating a promising model of innovation promotion is determined as important tool to boost and support innovations in public governance.


Download data is not yet available.

| Views: 50 | Downloads: 36

Author Biographies

Anna Zalievska-Shyshak , Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Theory, Macro and Microeconomics

Anatolii Shyshak, National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine

PhD student in the Department of Parliamentarism and Political Management


Potts, J. (2009). The innovation deficit in public services: The curious problem of too much efficiency and not enough waste and failure. Innovation, 11(1), 34-43.

Serrat, O. (2017). Innovation in the public sector. In Knowledge Solutions (pp. 559-568). Springer, Singapore.

Bourgon, J. (2008). The Future of Public Service: A Search for a New Balance: Keynote Address to the 2008 IPAA National Conference, Sydney, NSW, June 2008. australian Journal of Public administration, 67(4), 390-404.

Lundvall, B. Å., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting.

Edward Elgar Publishing.Gault, F. (2007), “Science, technology and innovation indicators: The context of change”, in Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Soete, L., Verspagen, B., & Ter Weel, B. (2010). Systems of innovation. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1159-1180). North-Holland.

Edquist, C. (2013). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. Routledge.

Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand.

Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems—analytical concept and development tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119.

Braczyk, H. J., Cooke, P. N., & Heidenreich, M. (Eds.). (1998). Regional innovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world. Psychology Press..

Dolata, U. (2009). Technological innovations and sectoral change: Transformative capacity, adaptability, patterns of change: An analytical framework. Research policy, 38(6), 1066-1076.

Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of innovation and New Technology, 14(1-2), 63-82.

Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of evolutionary economics, 1(2), 93-118.

Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological forecasting and social change, 74(4), 413-432.

Johnson, A., & Jacobsson, S. (2001). Inducement and blocking mechanisms in the development of a new industry: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden. Technology and the market: demand, users and innovation, 89-111.

Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change–Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 215-237.

Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research policy, 37(3), 407-429.

Kukk, P., Moors, E. H. M., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015). The complexities in system building strategies—The case of personalized cancer medicines in England. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 98, 47-59.

Hall, M., & Holt, R. (2008). New Public Management and cultural change: the case of UK public sector project sponsors as leaders. Innovation in public sector services: entrepreneurship, creativity and management. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 21-40.

Podger, A. (2015). Innovation in the public sector: beyond the rhetoric to a genuine ‘learning culture’. Managing under austerity, delivering under pressure, 119-130.

Brown, K., & Osborne, S. P. (2012). Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. Routledge.

Australian Government (2010), Empowering Change: Fostering Innovation in the Australian Public Service, Canberra,

NAO (2009), Innovation Across Central Government, National Audit Office, London,

Scott‐Kemmis, D., & Matthews, J. (2015). Australia's National Innovation System. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1-17.

OECD (2017a), Fostering Innovation in the Public Sector, OECD Publishing, Paris,

Privy Council Office (2017), Annual Report: Central Innovation Hub, 2016-2017, Ottawa,

Brown, K., & Osborne, S. P. (2012). Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. Routledge.

Windrum, P., & Koch, P. M. (Eds.). (2008). Innovation in public sector services: entrepreneurship, creativity and management. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Freeman, C. (2013). Economics of industrial innovation. Routledge.

Miles, I. (2013). Public service innovation: what messages from the collision of innovation studies and services research? In Handbook of innovation in public services. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. J. (2005). Think, play, do: Technology, innovation, and organization. Oxford University Press on Demand.

Borins, S. F. (2014). The persistence of innovation in government (Vol. 8). Brookings Institution Press with Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation.

Borins, S. F. (Ed.). (2009). Innovations in government: Research, recognition, and replication. Brookings Institution Press.

Borins, S. (2006). The Challenge of Innovating in Government Innovation. IMB Center for The Business of Government.

Windrum, P. (2008). 11. Conclusions: public innovation and entrepreneurship. Innovation in public sector services: Entrepreneurship, creativity and management, 228.

Eggers, W. D., & Singh, S. K. (2009). The Public Innovator's Playbook: Nurturing bold ideas in government. Ash Institute, Harvard Kennedy School.

Newton, T. (2016). The Power of Positive Deviance: How unlikely innovators solve the world's toughest problems. InterAction, 8(1), 98.